Internet commerce has incredibly interwoven a company’s brand and visual identity. To effectively convey their brands’ message, successful organizations meticulously pursue an expressive yet unified visual style for their websites and rely on the full breadth of modern web capabilities. It’s no coincidence that websites put so much thought into their design and layout; a flawless online presence is essential for any company looking to make a good impression.
CSS is a highly flexible language that describes a web page’s rendering and visual layout principles and style and is the driving force behind the web’s tremendous communicative potential. As helpful as CSS is, its adaptability makes it prone to bugs and challenging to test.
CSS errors are easy to spot since they manifest as glaring hiccups or inconsistent design, undermining a site’s carefully crafted professional appearance. However, they can be challenging to spot. Subtle visual problems manifest only at specific window sizes, devices, or screen orientations and in specific browser versions are common side effects of CSS modifications.
Because of this, testing for CSS regression is particularly difficult. It takes a long list of checks on a single page to ensure accuracy. Humans cannot handle this. However, human operators cannot rely on the results of a manual CSS regression test when dealing with new, responsive designs.
How Do CSS Errors Slip In?
To appreciate why CSS regression testing is so challenging, it helps to first look at how faulty CSS updates might seep into a project.
- Each element on a webpage, such as its size, location, color, font, and more, is defined by a set of style rules in CSS that tell the browser how to display them. When a browser renders a page, it applies a set of CSS rules; thus, it’s essential to account for every possible browser, device, screen size, and user orientation.
- As a result, a single page may not use all of the rules specified in a given CSS stylesheet.
- Some rules, such as those that dictate the appearance of form elements, won’t apply to a page that doesn’t have any such elements.
- Also, certain rules are conditional, meaning they only apply in specific scenarios. For instance, a laptop’s full-screen browser window may ignore the CSS style rules that address rendering requirements for narrow displays.
- There are several permutations of device type, screen orientation and size, window size, browser version, and more for a developer to remember consistently or for a tester to cover manually.
- Because of this, developers frequently overlook CSS errors. Given how stealthily they enter, they often go undiscovered for extended periods.
Reading Suggestion: Native vs Hybrid App Development
CSS Testing Methods
How, then, do you verify CSS code? You can’t expect users to tell you about issues with your website.
- Adding a CSS linter is an easy, low-effort fix. A tool such as “CSS Lint” can detect syntax mistakes in CSS and obvious deviations from established standards. These can catch many real-world issues before reaching the QA testing team.
- However, syntax issues are only one of the sources of bugs; logical mistakes are. Not only can they be introduced by in-house modifications but also through CMS or plug-in updates. No warnings are displayed because the browser accepts the rendering instructions as expected, even though they are incorrect – specifically, wrong in a visual sense or in a way that people can recognize. Because of this, testing for CSS regression relies heavily on the importance of sight.
- You can perform a straightforward CSS regression test by comparing two screenshots of the same page, one taken when the page was in excellent working order (before a CMS update, for example) and one taken after your developers applied any change to the app. Your app may have a problem if the two pictures line up differently.
- This process, known as visual regression testing, may appear simple at first, but testers must repeat it for each page and interaction feature of a website on each possible operating system, web browser, and device type.
Automating CSS Regression Testing Tool
High effort and the limitation of human perception are the primary motivating elements behind automated regression testing. The goal is to take advantage of what machines are adept at (carrying out a task repeatedly at a high rate) while keeping humans involved (making design trade-offs, prioritizing problem fixes, and more.).
The premise behind testing for visual regression is solid. It uses objective metrics to keep testing results free of noise and is optimized to find issues with evident consequences for the consumer.
CSS style updates are a good choice for automated regression testing because many CSS defects are hard to discover because they only occur in certain situations.
Conclusion
With the various testing methods and automated regression tools entering the picture, regression testing is becoming manageable. HeadSpin, a software testing platform, enables Ai testing and helps its users meet their regression testing requirements. Reach out to know more!
